X-Git-Url: http://g0dil.de/git?a=blobdiff_plain;f=Packets%2FMainpage.dox;h=308d9ac404c9f28f29e1e90c5dcc2b24546180b5;hb=bd9f9d3fd6fbcff0112a7bf48ab9284da9576b11;hp=817a4556046658a7715c56316f14c54c9f050d38;hpb=51b10105e78a9ffee631223f50e63aa28bb5d2b4;p=senf.git diff --git a/Packets/Mainpage.dox b/Packets/Mainpage.dox index 817a455..308d9ac 100644 --- a/Packets/Mainpage.dox +++ b/Packets/Mainpage.dox @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ \li \ref protocolbundle_default : Some basic default protocols: Ethernet, Ip, TCP, UDP \li \ref protocolbundle_mpegdvb : MPEG and DVB protocols + \li \ref protocolbundle_80211 : 802.11 protocols + \li \ref protocolbundle_80221 : 802.21 protocols There are two ways to link with a bundle @@ -117,7 +119,7 @@ \code Packet p = ...; - // Change first byte of packet to 0 + // Change first byte of packet to 1 p.data()[0] = 1u; // Copy packet data into a vector @@ -585,8 +587,8 @@ invalidate the wrapper if it changes the packets size. \see - senf::VectorParser_Container Interface of the vector parser container wrapper \n - senf::ListParser_Container Interface of the list parser container wrapper + senf::VectorParser / senf::VectorParser_Container Interface of the vector parser \n + senf::ListParser / senf::ListParser_Container Interface of the list parser \subsubsection packet_usage_collection_variant The Variant Parser @@ -660,6 +662,81 @@ to define variants in a different way giving other names to the special members (\c has_\e name or \c init_\e name etc.). This must be documented with the composite or protocol parser which defines the variant. + + \section packet_usage_annotation Annotations + + Sometimes we need to store additional data with a packet. Data, which is not part of the packet + itself but gives us some information about the packet: A timestamp, the interface the packet was + received on or other processing related information. + + This type of information can be stored using the annotation interface. The following example + will read packet data and will store the read timestamp as a packet annotation. + + \code + struct Timestamp { + senf::ClockService::clock_t value; + }; + + senf::EthernetPacket packet (senf::EthernetPacket::create(senf::noinit)); + sock.read(packet.data(), 0u); + packet.annotation().value = senf::ClockService::now(); + \endcode + + In the same way, the annotation can be used later + + \code + if (senf::ClockService::now() - packet.annotation().value + > senf::ClockService::seconds(1)) { + // Ouch ... this packet is to old + // ... + } + \endcode + + It is very important to define a specific structure (or class or enum) type for each type of + annotation. \e Never directly store a fundamental type as an annotation: The name of the type is + used to look up the annotation, so you can store only one annotation for each built-in type. \c + typedef does not help since \c typedef does not introduce new type names, it only defines an + alias. + + Of course, the annotation structure can be arbitrary. However, one very important caveat: If the + annotation is not a POD type, it needs to inherit from senf::ComplexAnnotation. A type is POD, + if it is really just a bunch of bytes: No (non-static) members, no constructor or destructor and + no base classes and all it's members must be POD too. So the following annotation is complex + since \c std::string is not POD + + \code + struct ReadInfo : senf::ComplexAnnotation + { + std::string interface; + senf::ClockService::clock_t timestamp; + }; + + // ... + + packet.annotation().interface = "eth0"; + packet.annotation().timestamp = senf::ClockService::now(); + + // Or store a reference to the annotation for easier access + + ReadInfo & info (packet.annotation()); + + if (info.interface == "eth0") { + // ... + } + \endcode + + Every annotation is automatically default-initialized, there is no way to query, whether a + packet holds a specific annotation -- every packet conceptually always holds all annotations. + + You should use annotations economically: Every annotation type used in your program will + allocate an annotation slot in \e all packet data structures. So don't use hundreds of different + annotation types if this is not really necessary: Reuse annotation types where possible or + aggregate data into larger annotation structures. The best solution is to use annotations only + for a small number of packet specific informations. If you really need to manage a train-load of + data together with the packet consider some other way (e.g. place the packet into another class + which holds that data). + + \see senf::Packet::annotation() */ /** \page packet_new Defining new Packet types