X-Git-Url: http://g0dil.de/git?a=blobdiff_plain;f=Socket%2FSocketPolicy.hh;h=8dba18b1c02f00daaa2c1c7dcd10b2e2a282f5d4;hb=aec1302f91b51edb58f8a97985ab2e0aa9c8db66;hp=eb453aff28e7a4ae32fdebed4b8468ab7a66e77a;hpb=ac88c68bb3aebad5f7d91ce44f1c845d973f9613;p=senf.git

diff --git a/Socket/SocketPolicy.hh b/Socket/SocketPolicy.hh
index eb453af..8dba18b 100644
--- a/Socket/SocketPolicy.hh
+++ b/Socket/SocketPolicy.hh
@@ -24,12 +24,20 @@
     \brief Policy Framework public header
 
     \todo We should probably remove BufferingPolicy from the
-    interface, it does not make much sense (how did I come to include
-    it ??)
+	interface, it does not make much sense (how did I come to
+	include it ??)
     
     \todo Do we want to support separate read and write policies. This
-    allows to treat pipes within this framework however, is this worth
-    the effort?
+	allows to treat pipes within this framework however, is this
+	worth the effort?
+
+    \idea Creating a new Socket will create 4 (!) new instances (The
+	handle, the body, the policy and the protocol) of which 3
+	(argh) (body, policy and protocol) live on the heap. This is
+	expensive. We should convert all the policy classes to
+	singletons and assign the same instance to all socket bodies
+	with the same policy. This would reduce the number of heap
+	allocations per socket handle to two.
  */
 
 /** \defgroup policy_group The Policy Framework
@@ -206,8 +214,7 @@
     senf::ConnectedCommunicationPolicyIs is based on the \c
     boost::enable_if template).
 
-    \see \ref policy_framework \n
-	 \ref extend_policy \n
+    \see \ref extend_policy \n
          <a class="ext" href="http://www.boost.org/libs/utility/enable_if.html">The Boost enable_if utility</a> \n
          <a class="ext" href="http://www.boost.org/libs/mpl/doc/index.html">The Boost.MPL library</a> \n
          <a class="ext" href="http://www.boost.org/libs/preprocessor/doc/index.html">The Boost.Preprocessor library</a>