//#include "Exception.ih"
// Custom includes
+#include <boost/lexical_cast.hpp>
#define prefix_ inline
///////////////////////////////cti.p///////////////////////////////////////
-template <int Code>
-prefix_ senf::ErrnoException<Code>::ErrnoException(std::string const & where)
- : SystemException(where,fixed_code)
+template <class Exc, class Arg>
+prefix_ typename boost::enable_if< boost::is_convertible<Exc*,senf::ExceptionMixin*>, Exc & >::type
+senf::operator<<(Exc const & exc, Arg const & arg)
+{
+ const_cast<Exc &>(exc).append( boost::lexical_cast<std::string>(arg) );
+ return const_cast<Exc &>(exc);
+}
+
+///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+// senf::WrapExcecption<BaseException>
+
+template <class BaseException>
+prefix_ senf::WrapException<BaseException>::WrapException(BaseException const & base)
+ : ExceptionMixin(base.what()), BaseException(base)
{}
-// I for some reason need to explicitly define this constructor even though it's defined identically
-// to the default version (even though SyntaxException has a custom copy constructor, the
-// non-existent std::stringstream copy constructor will be called otherwise). I believe this is a
-// g++ bug.
-template <int Code>
-prefix_ senf::ErrnoException<Code>::ErrnoException(ErrnoException const & other)
- : SystemException(other)
+template <class BaseException>
+prefix_ senf::WrapException<BaseException>::~WrapException()
+ throw()
{}
+template <class BaseException>
+prefix_ char const * senf::WrapException<BaseException>::what()
+ const throw()
+{
+ return message().c_str();
+}
+
/////////////////////////////cti.e///////////////////////////////////////
#undef prefix_